Skip to main content

VA combined ratings table (38 CFR §4.25, Table I)

Source: 38 CFR §4.25 on eCFR, issue of August 27, 2026, retrieved 2026-09-21.

Find your higher rating in the left column and your next rating in the top row. The number where they meet is the combined value. Round it to the nearest 10 for your final rating: 50% and 30% meet at 65, which becomes 70%.

Want it done for you? The combined rating calculator runs this table for any number of ratings and applies the bilateral factor when both arms or both legs are rated.

Why the ratings do not add up

VA does not add percentages. It treats each rating as a share of what is left of you after the ratings above it. A 60% rating leaves you 40% "efficient". A further 30% takes 30% of that remaining 40%, which is 12, so the two combine to 72, not 90. The regulation says it this way:

Table I, Combined Ratings Table, results from the consideration of the efficiency of the individual as affected first by the most disabling condition, then by the less disabling condition, then by other less disabling conditions, if any, in the order of severity. Thus, a person having a 60 percent disability is considered 40 percent efficient. Proceeding from this 40 percent efficiency, the effect of a further 30 percent disability is to leave only 70 percent of the efficiency remaining after consideration of the first disability, or 28 percent efficiency altogether. The individual is thus 72 percent disabled, as shown in table I opposite 60 percent and under 30 percent.

Three or more ratings

Work from the highest rating down, one at a time, and feed each result back into the left column. For 50%, 30% and 20%:

  1. 50% and 30% meet at 65.
  2. Row 65, column 20 gives 72.
  3. 72 rounds to a final rating of 70%.

Round once, at the end. §4.25(b) says the conversion to the nearest 10 "will be done only once per rating decision" and is the last step. Rounding 65 up to 70 before adding the 20% would give 76 and a final 80%, which is wrong.

Where the bilateral factor fits

If you have ratings on both arms or both legs, combine those first, then add 10% of that combined value before you touch the rest of the table. The 10% is added, not combined. The bilateral factor guide walks through the §4.26 steps with worked numbers.

The full table

Left column: the higher rating, or the combined value so far. Top row: the next rating. The table starts at 19 because 10% combined with 10% is 19, the lowest value two compensable ratings can produce. Values of 95 and up round to 100%.

38 CFR 4.25 Table I, Combined Ratings Table
Value 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
19 273543516068768492
20 283644526068768492
21 293745536168768492
22 303845536169778492
23 313846546269778592
24 323947546270778592
25 334048556370788593
26 334148566370788593
27 344249566471788593
28 354250576471788693
29 364350576572798693
30 374451586572798693
31 384552596672798693
32 394652596673808693
33 404653606773808793
34 414754606774808793
35 424855616874818794
36 424955626874818794
37 435056626975818794
Value 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
38 445057636975818894
39 455157637076828894
40 465258647076828894
41 475359657176828894
42 485459657177838894
43 495460667277838994
44 505561667278838994
45 515662677378848995
46 515762687378848995
47 525863687479848995
48 535864697479849095
49 545964697580859095
50 556065707580859095
51 566166717680859095
52 576266717681869095
53 586267727781869195
54 596368727782869195
55 606469737882879196
56 606569747882879196
Value 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
57 616670747983879196
58 626671757983879296
59 636771758084889296
60 646872768084889296
61 656973778184889296
62 667073778185899296
63 677074788285899396
64 687175788286899396
65 697276798386909397
66 697376808386909397
67 707477808487909397
68 717478818487909497
69 727578818588919497
70 737679828588919497
71 747780838688919497
72 757880838689929497
73 767881848789929597
74 777982848790929597
75 788083858890939598
Value 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
76 788183868890939598
77 798284868991939598
78 808285878991939698
79 818385879092949698
80 828486889092949698
81 838587899192949698
82 848687899193959698
83 858688909293959798
84 868789909294959798
85 878890919394969799
86 878990929394969799
87 889091929495969799
88 899092939495969899
89 909192939596979899
90 919293949596979899
91 929394959696979899
92 939494959697989899
93 949495969797989999
94 959596969798989999

How we check this table

We pull Table I from the eCFR's own data service and store it with the issue date. Our calculator does the same arithmetic by formula, and a test in our build compares the two on all 684 values. If a single value ever disagrees, the site does not publish. More detail is on the methodology page.

When your decision letter shows a different number

The table gives the schedular result for the ratings VA granted. If your letter shows a lower combined rating, first check which ratings were actually granted and whether the bilateral factor was applied. If the math is right but a rating itself looks too low, you have review options: see what to do after a VA decision you disagree with.

This is the published schedule, not a prediction of any individual decision. VA decides each claim on its own evidence.